« June 2007 | Main | August 2007 »

Fun Home

BechdelFun Home, Alison Bechdel. At this point, just from the books I've read in the last month or so, I have pretty close to the full reading list for an English class on the topic Unhappy Marriages in English and American Literature, which is strange because I'm not doing this on purpose: mostly I'm reading either things I picked up in London or what I spot on the New Arrivals shelf at my public library. Fun Home is Bechdel's graphic  (in several senses) memoir of her childhood in rural Pennsylvania with her emotionally distant parents, particularly her father, an English teacher/funeral home director who may or may not have committed suicide when the author was 20. This book is just about the best thing I've read in a long, long while. It amazed me so much I don't even think I can evaluate anymore whether or not it's objectively good. I think it's possible Bechdel tells more than she shows, but I'm so overwhelmed by the reading experience that I'm afraid I may be making that part up.

How Can We Miss You When You Won't Go Away?

Dear Jenny,

I've been meaning to report to you about last week's new episode of Top Chef, except there wasn't one. It's very strange and I wonder what the reason behind it was, but just weeks after the break for Independence Day, we had another gap. Instead of another set of challenges and an elimination, we had "Watch What Happens" Top Chef reunion, featuring some contestants from each of the three seasons. Why now? Why them? What is there to say, really? We learned very little: people we thought were kookie were actually kookier than we knew. Everyone really still hates Marcel. (Get over it, assholes!) Ilan and I have the same glasses. Sam is really hot with a shaved head. Padma Lakshmi got that scar from a car accident when she was a child. Andy Cohen throws to the clip really enthusiastically. Maybe something more interesting happened at the end: I had to turn the TV off when Sandee (name?) from season three described Top Chef as "a microcosm."

Love,

-- Pete

Cyrano de Imsosuregerac

A little bit of forward movement on the Luke-Noah story. That is to say that Van Hansis and Jake Silberman appeared in a scene together this week. Luke, Noah and Maddie are all interns at WOAK, the local television station that is co-owned by, I think, Luke's mother, Lily. Their responsibilities are vague (not just because they're television characters in an underwritten storyline, but also because they're interns), but I think that they're supposed to be producing content for the station. Until yesterday, I thought that meant that they were reporting, but now it seems like they're producing a scripted film or series, possibly called "Cellphone Girl,"* which is weird, because this is really just a local station and what local (non-Canadian) television stations produce their own, scripted content? (Maybe it's a web-only series?) Luke is writing lines for Maddie to read and Noah to film and they're all about unrequited love. Luke's inspiration? Noah. I'm not sure how long we have to wait for Noah to figure it out and whether that will be before or after he starts requiting. 

*Sorry.  I was in Slovenia when this storyline began.

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Amazon

I spent all day Saturday waiting for UPS to deliver my copy of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.  I know.  This is why people don't read blogs -- the danger of embarrassing revelations.  Anyway, it was a whole thing -- UPS apparently subcontracted all Harry Potter deliveries to the US Postal Service, but didn't bother to communicate that; then my mail carrier delivered, in lieu of my copy, a cryptic note, which seemed to suggest that . . . something . . . had been returned to the post office, which was closed, because it's Saturday, and it's just a damned children's book, anyway, and then it turned out that my super was holding it for me and . . . mischief managed. 

Then I lost another day reading the damned thing, and now I'm trying to decide what I thought of it.  I think fans of the series will be completely satisfied with the conclusion: it does the same things the other six books do, and it does them about as well as those do.  I think, at the end, all questions are answered satisfactorily.  With a few exceptions, every character and magical object that appeared in the other books pops up for at least a cameo. 

Those who don't care for the books and those who read them but are critical will not be disappointed, either -- about the same weaknesses as the other books.   There's a huge freight of exposition at the end, some of the bullshit metaphysical variety ("and then your soul did X"); some of the bullshit psychological variety ("because my parents hated Muggles . . .").  Some of it, though, to be fair, is handled impressively: there's at least one late-round revelation that's a bit shocking.  As with all the rest of the books, there are long middle passages in which nothing much happens while Harry, Ron and Hermione endlessly chew over the plot to date.  Apart from those, though, unlike the placeholder sixth volume, there's a lot of action. 

Now I'm off to read other reviews and analyses.  If I find anything good, I'll post the links.  -- Peter

P.S. Here's the only commentary that hasn't annoyed me. 

Tibio!

Dear Jenny,

Wow.  I really don't care about the current cycle (Can I use that term without paying royalties to Tyra Banks?) of Top Chef.  I don't think I have the energy to go through last night's episode; in fact, I'm not 100% sure I was awake for it.

What is wrong with this show?  Something seems to be missing and I can't quite place my finger on it.  I think it's personalities.  I don't care about any of these people and it turns out that learning about food is just not enough.  Maybe it's just been too damned long since the last season (*cough* cycle) of Project Runway and a girl can't live on ceviche alone.   I need fashion, God damn it.

Fine.  So there was a Quick Fire with an Argentinian guest judge.  She would say something completely reasonable, but because of her accent, Padma would laugh like she had just dissed Midnight's Children.   Johnny or Poppy or Jerry or whichever of those bros is not Howie won, but I honestly can't remember what he made.  It was probably a trio of something or other.

The Elimination Challenge required the chefs to cook something Latin for the cast of a Telemundo production called Madame Chocolate (funny!).  The bros made some really good dishes; their distaff equivalents, sudden best friends Casey (aka "Bird Nest") and Lia (um . . . ), plus cocky, knifey Hung and Sara N. (one of my favorites) made some really shitty dishes.  In the end, Lia went home, because her polenta was both mushy and ethnically inaccurate, and also because she is boring, even more boring than Bird Nest. 

Did I miss something?

Love,

-- Pete    

Faisons le Parkour!

Forget tagging.  Screw thrashing, spinning, breaking . . . all those other urban things you could be doing with your time.  As far as I'm concerned, it's all about the parkour.  While we're at it, screw CGI.  I forgot until I saw Live Free or Die HARD a couple weeks ago, but real stunts are about a million times better than computer-generated effects.  Unfortunately, I'm not seeing a lot of really good either parkour or real stunts movies coming out right.  Here's a good one, though: District B13 (Banlieue 13).  It stars Cyril Raffaelli, one of the villains from Live Free or Die Hard, as police captain Damien Tomaso, who . . . you don't really need to know the plot, right?  It looks cool and it makes only a little bit of sense (thanks, Luc Besson). 

What I'm Reading

I'm clearing the decks for Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (is that really the title?) . . . The most recent books I've read don't really have anything to do with magic or puns, but have a lot in common with each other.

SteadThe Man Who Loved Children by Christina Stead.  This article convinced me to read this book, about a disastrously ill-suited couple who use their six children to torment each other, a long time ago, but then it took me a long time to get to it.  Then it took me forever to finish it, because it's so appalling that I could only read it in small doses.   The father feeds one of the children partially digested food out of his own mouth; I take a break.  The eldest daughter helps a neighbor drown her cat; I take a break.  Repeat.  It's really good, though, and once I gave myself over to the horror of it, I couldn't put it down.  Stead really created an entire world in this book: the reading experience is claustrophobic, like Stead's attention to the Pollit family is too close; looking back, though, it's surprising how broad Stead's scope is -- you get not just the family but their entire milieu -- neighbors, schools, grandparents, co-workers, etc. 

Hardy_2 The Woodlanders, Thomas Hardy.  Another entry in the "Are you sure marriage is for you?" genre.  This is maybe not one of Hardy's best-known novels, but it's among his most interesting.  In general, I think Hardy's characterizations of women and his views on both gender relations and sex are surprisingly modern for a Victorian.  This book is probably one of his most modern in that regard.  Interesting narrative structure: whereas in others of Hardy's novels (thinking especially of The Mayor of Casterbridge and Far from the Madding Crowd, but I think Tess of the d'Urbervilles and Jude the Obscure are like this, too) the plot is pretty heavy and complicated throughout, in The Woodlanders, almost nothing seems to happen (not to say it's boring, just more naturalistic) until about the final 50 pages, at which point it becomes almost unbearably suspenseful.

KeenanBlue Heaven, Joe Keenan.  More of the same theme, only completely different mood: a gay man and a straight woman decide to marry in order to cash in on the wedding presents.  Then things get really complicated.  Keenan was a staff writer and producer on Frasier, which makes a lot of sense -- very much the same sensibility and pacing.  Only intermittently is it laugh-out-loud funny, but overall it's breezy and enjoyable.  Very good update -- was going to say "modernization" but that's not right -- of P.G. Wodehouse.  See also Wake Up, Sir! by Jonathan Ames.    

Razor!

Did we already know that the Battlestar Galactica movie, the one that's supposed to tide us over until the January season 4 premiere, is called Battlestar Galactica: Razor?  I can't decide if that's a really good title -- because it makes me think of that movie in which Katie Holmes says "Razor!" when she means "OK!"? -- I think it's called -- yep -- Disturbing Behavior -- or if it's really bad for, um, the same reasons. 

Anyway, this article tells us a lot more about what the Sci Fi Channel is up to in the next few months.   I'm interested in Going Homer, because I like Ben Browder, but I feel really stupid and philistine, because it took me about five minutes before I realized that he's playing a 21st-century Homer, not a 21st-century Homer Simpson, whatever that would mean.

Hot Food, Lukewarm Entertainment

I'm just about to give up on Top Chef.  I don't care about any of the contestants.  I think it's possible it's me, not them.  Some of them (the one with the fauxhawk, the really tall one, the cocky one, the other cocky one . . . ) seem like they might be dynamic personalities, worth watching and rooting for or against.  I still care about food, I think.  The judges are still about as trustworthy as they've ever been (ie, less dubious than the crazy poseurs over at crazy Top Design or Tyra and her cadre of confidence men).  Something about this show just leaves me flat, though. 

Last night, let's see . . . Everyone cried, right?  Did I imagine that?  Casey bawled and bawled because she was not going to get sent home.  There was something kind of amusing the way she twisted "I had immunity and consequently I inflicted an inedible tuna 'bird's nest' on the jury," into "the jury is giving me a guilt trip, and consequently I am going to cry."  And then all the other chefs were like, "Oh, yeah.  We might be sent home early, but let's comfort bird's nest girl."

Camille got sent home. That seems unfair, because as far as I can tell, she had never previously appeared on the show.  Shouldn't they have given her some sort of handicap for that?  Also, it was confusing because I thought hot people usually did better on these shows. 

Product Placement, Missouri

I've been fast-forwarding through As the World Turns for the past week.  The teen set is on location in Branson (Noah's hometown) for a benefit concert and a showdown between Gwen and her buck-toothed doppelganger, Cleo.  I'm watching the Luke and Noah stuff and trying to ignore Cleo, a character I find somehow offensive -- and not just aesthetically -- even if I'm not clear exactly which social group Cleo is insulting.  Is there a lobbying group for the severely inbred?  The Branson shoot is kind of funny, though, just because it appears to have been paid for entirely by promotional considerations: a lot of establishing shots of restaurants and theme parks, plus dialogue that's bluntly favorable about the food and sightseeing opportunities. 

So far, a lot of mixed messages from Noah.  First, he and Maddie shared mochaccinos (gay) and blondies (gay).  Then his father (Daniel Hugh Kelly) told him he can't study film (straight) in Chicago (gay), because he has to serve in the military (gay).  Next, he took Maddie to a water park (straight) and slept with her (straight).  Then he dropped his towel in front of Luke (gay).  Later, he acted weird when Luke came out to him (gay).  How does that math come out?